>>2138
>So, exactly like the materialist scientist's philosopher's appeal to their multiverse fantasy, then? At least the science apologist's claims are based primarily in observable reality. :D
I wouldn't write off a something like a multiverse, but I don’t treat it like a foregone conclusion either.
>Which part of (illegitimate, in this case) "free will" was the hard one?
>Again strong free will is at play here.
Couldn’t Yahweh have created a universe with free will but without evil?
>There's a wonderful unabridged audiobook series of the entire collection. Its performed by various British personalities. If you're a fan, you owe it to yourself to give them a listen. Cheers, Anon.
I'm kind of tempted to watch the BBC adaptations again. They might be cheesy, but I find their production values charming in comparison to modern adaptations. I haven’t seen any of them since I was a kid. Too bad they don't cover the entire series like the audiobooks you're talking about.