>>3307
>Cool anecdote
>Another cool anecdote
Aww, that one really got under your skin. How adorable.
>you see the most prominent works of literature and art magnifying love
Steamy romance pulp for cat ladies idealizing something that doesn't exist. Truly the works of literary titans. Great argument.
>scores of violent criminals that were mentally broken by loneliness and lack of love
Right, every man ever rejected turns into Ted Bundy.
>Your narrow materialistic view isn't as smart as you think it is
<I'm 14 and this is so, so deep. You just don't get it, mom
>social interactions
I like how you're trying to recontextualize my view into a broad rejection of socialization when it's clear from the OP, my post and various others that this thread is discussing romance. I really should have nipped this in the bud when you started going on about children and parents. The tangent about plants added nothing.
>How's that for a cartoon narrative ?
Waxing about feelings is pretty comical, yes.
>I'm not surprised at all this reality escapes your notice, as your narrow materialistic worldview's natural conclusion is always a hedonistic, materialistic, individualistic
Overuse of polysyllabic adjectives isn't an adequate substitute for substance.
>No amount of irony will ever manage to hide the fact that your edgelord beliefs about life are pants-on-head absurd and can be dismissed with a soyjak
<your beliefs are just so obviously wrong that i cant– i mean i wont refute them right now so here is a crude drawing that represents you
And you were even too much of a little bitch to commit to posting the real deal, haha.
>And I guess you draw this observation from your extensive experience in the matter ?
Yeah, I have a lot of cool anecdotes about it.
>parental love can't be so different from sexual attraction
Honest question, are you ESL? You're the one who brought up relationships between children and parents to begin with. I shouldn't have entertained this tangent previously, but I explained why I also don't believe in "parental love" and it had fuck all to do with sexuality. You're the only one making that connection here. I'm sure it felt really good and as if your IQ went up 15 points for thinking you found an excuse to namedrop Freud, though.
>It doesn't take a great detective to figure out that my reply was a dismissive mockery
You tried covering your ass by saying you intended to "keep the board nice and cozy". You're a terrible bullshitter.
>You write two lines backed by nothing to deny the existence of the main subject of the thread
Read the first line of the thread. You seem to have problems comprehending what others post. Regardless, giving my two cents in a concise little package is still leagues more effort than merely quoting opinions you don't like and attaching soyjaks to them. Don't kid yourself.
>If it's any consolation, your struggle is one I share
I think your olives have gone sour.
>This isn't your first attempt to strawman me
Seems like you might need to consult the Wikipedia fallacy portal again there, buddy. Strawmanning definitely isn't when someone accurately mocks your argument. A work of fiction makes for horrible evidence toward proving something is real.
>Because you're extra-ordinarily gifted in the field of understanding communication, remember ?
At least more than you, I'd say.
>your childish behavior
Dismissive mockery is the behavior of big, mature adults who wear ties and drink coffee and have meetings where they make important decisions.
>everyone agrees
Who's everyone? The voices in your head?
>Which is the only reason you could've possibly had to take exception to my initial reply to begin with
No, it's because you expressed clear disdain for my opinion but you were too much of an incompetent moron to actually engage with it.
>The tragedy here is your inability to admit certain aspects of the world that are among the first to be commonly grasped by toddlers
Being childlike is doubleplusungood. Remember, Mr. Adult, Esq?
>hence their frequent usage in stories
<base your worldview off fairytales or you're a dumb doo-doo head
>You don't want to believe in love and I'm ot here to force you. Just don't expect people to go along with your delusions when you barge in preaching nihilism only to throw a fit when they don't
I gave you another opportunity to make a compelling argument, or even one at all, since you failed to do so the first time and simply pooped your diaper in a fit of rage when you saw an opinion that threatened your dogmas. And I'm not "nihilistic" just because my perspective on this topic isn't lollipops and gumdrops like your's.