/film/ - FILM

FILM v 5.0


New Thread
Name
×
Email
Subject*
Message*
Files* Max 5 files50MB total
Password
[New Thread]


Jschan updated, report in >>>/meta/ if anything is wrong

Welcome to /film/ discussion
Rules


key.gif
[Hide] (411.5KB, 256x175) Reverse
[JW03 ~ 09/11/2019]
Friendly link exchange
398 replies and 205 files omitted. View the full thread
>>3267
Okay, here is 720
mega.nz/folder/29A3XAoT#i1UhE7bYLx4GI8AIpMBMcQ
Replies: >>3269
>>3268
Can I get it in 1080p or 2160p?
438545-what-happens-to-a-displaced-ant-0-230-0-345-crop.jpg
[Hide] (24.8KB, 230x345) Reverse
reviving this dead thread to see if anyone has What Happens to a Displaced Ant (Shirin Abushaqra)?
vlcsnap-2012-03-02-13h41m06s131.png
[Hide] (722.3KB, 853x480) Reverse
I'm looking fore a bluray rip of Rienzi (2010), a rarely performed Wagner opera. I see the DVDs and also the remux but I didn't find a working link for a smaller HD version.
Replies: >>3685
>>3684
Neat! I too would be interested in watching this.

no_other_love.mp4
[Hide] (16.8MB, 716x572, 01:52)
Video Clips: Old and New
76 replies and 96 files omitted. View the full thread
there's_always_another_factory.mp4
[Hide] (3.8MB, 640x480, 00:22)
>randomly finding film dialogue used in a song but forgetting what song it was
Replies: >>3618
FXRMLESS_ENERGY_-_FUCHSIA_[1756752594].mp3
[Hide] (4MB, 04:20)
>>3616
River_of_Fundament_~_Dinner_Song-8Yo3tgts6RU.mp4
[Hide] (35.2MB, 1920x1012, 04:47)
Replies: >>3681
>>3629
How is this movie based on a novel about the sex-lives of ancient Egyptian pharaohs
Replies: >>3683
>>3681
I thought ancient evenings was more about one guy going to the afterlife or something? The movie is about Norman Mailer, who wrote the novel, committing suicide and going through the same process as the POV character in his novel. Lots of out-of-place imagery from ancient egypt in this movie, like the car with the winged scarab decals and the ambulance with a sarcophagus in it.  

Mostly I just thought it was gross, boring and overall unpleasant to watch, just like Barney's other work, though it's a lot better produced than most of the Cremaster cycle and I did enjoy some of the photography, really captures the look of a typical American Midwestern industrial city.

kinoeye.gif
[Hide] (901.1KB, 500x369) Reverse
What was the last thing you watched, and what did you think of it?
176 replies and 176 files omitted. View the full thread
I like Tati the anti-modernist though it took me a while to warm up to his style..I can understand how Playtime might not be enjoyable if you're not sure what you're in for. I watched Mon Oncle first but it's probably best to start with M. Hulot's Holiday. If you don't like that you won't like the expansive version of it.
Replies: >>3677
>>3676
I knew what I was going into, this had no effect on my reaction. 
Regarding:
>a scream against modernism
and
>anti-modernist
This is an exaggeration. He was glibly playing with faults he saw in modernism, specifically the architecture, at least in Playtime. Nothing about this movie is truly "anti-modern."
Replies: >>3678
>>3677
Before I head out, I did want to add that my original post may have been harsh. I did like the cinematography and staging, and of course the effort was admirable from a construction standpoint. It wasn't accurate to say that I didn't care for anything.
>>3674
>And yes, it comes across as a vanity project
>Most successful directors are extremely egotistical and vain
I think usually most artists when having full control will attempt to create something entirely out of their minds, that by itself is individual so it is intrinsically egotistical as it tries to fulfill a vanity desire.
>I think that the simple-minded protagonist is extremely uninteresting. I also acknowledge that I do not care for French humor, nor do I care for mimes
I think it is obvious then that Tati is simply not someone who did stuff for your particular tastes, obviously nothing wrong with that but saying it fails at its objectives in harsh.
>This is too much of a spook
Oh boy i remember you now, IIRC you do have a strong conception and ideal of your preferred cinema so i cannot blame you for not liking some stuff that go fully into certain territories which may go opposite.
>logic and pure meaning
The idea of exploiting the fortes of the medium, which is movement and dynamism, so in Tati's mind it means showing intention by character movements involving their own presence and the interactions with their environments, which are represented by the urban living quarters in Mon Oncle, the futurist house and the main character's apartment building are characters themselves.
>Also, what old books are you talking about?
On top of my head i recall Tarkovsky's Sculpting Time referencing that idea, IIRC also one from Eisenstein.
>It's part of being a director. 
In many industries a director is merely a technician in charge of organizing other specialists, he does not care that much in the source other than moving pieces so all people involved walk in the same direction. Being a real auteur is a rare instance because the context in which artists situate themselves does not let them have all the power.
>I will almost always very soon after watch other films by the director.
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>3680
4years.png
[Hide] (164.8KB, 450x304) Reverse
>>3679
>Oh boy i remember you now
I think we communicated on a schlock thread (pic related). Yes, I am admittedly extremely autistic in my taste but it does not deter me from watching tons of films outside of what I would consider to be great. Hope life is well for you, inconnu.

images.jpg
[Hide] (4.2KB, 200x200) Reverse
Does the community on Cinematik or Cinemageddon actively discuss cinema ? I am on secret-cinema but I do not see them discussing , maybe their discussion forum thread is locked for higher class user, Moreover is Cinematik or Cinemageddon recruiting ?
33 replies and 7 files omitted. View the full thread
llama-stare.gif
[Hide] (964.5KB, 220x231) Reverse
rarelust.jpg
[Hide] (119.8KB, 760x920) Reverse
rarefilmm.jpg
[Hide] (452.2KB, 1280x2160) Reverse
>>3660
FUCK i thought i had the real thing bookmarked, it was the book blog, goddamn and here i was thinking that his latest uploads were just books.
Amidst my panic i found another site that seems on the same vein and one that i used once upon a time to find softcore stuff which also uploads normal stuff, glad to see they are alive. Here they are if someone is interested to have another data bank for potential hits.
https://rarefilmm.com/film-index/
https://rarelust.com/movies-index/

ripip Hawk Man, at least the books are nice, also the music blog
Replies: >>3662 >>3664
>>3661
He’s done uploading.
>>3660
>>3661
I’m not caught up on this. Did he die or simply stop adding movies?
Replies: >>3671
>>3664
AFAIK he had restarted the blog/site a couple of times due to copyright along with having to re-upload a ton of stuff again, hence why he devised that rule of no movies previous to a certain year and such, but last time that it got taken down he seems to have had enough and called it quits.
The book blog is still up, in theory that one should be much more of a shame if lost due to ripping books not being as easy as ripping a DVD or VHS, still his movie blog was gold due to having many titles that cannot be obtained unless you are in a specialized private tracker.
I think he's still very alive and somewhat active in other platforms in terms of presence but his film uploading days seem to have stopped.
Replies: >>3675
>>3671
I see, thanks. I knew that the blog was restarted a couple of times, I actually believe that I made the qtddtot on this board a couple iterations back. I thought he may have finally followed through with his old nickname, heh.

Lars_Von_Trier_Cannes_2011.jpg
[Hide] (58.3KB, 508x720) Reverse
tarantino.png
[Hide] (465.6KB, 780x532) Reverse
I recreate this thread from the old site. Post directors that you dislike. There are ones whose works are considered "great" by some but don't appeal to you for some reason or you think are overrated; there are also directors who are inept at their job and make awful films. Controversial opinions are welcome.
I think these two are overrated. Lars von Tryhard is an edgy kike and so are his movies. Taratino is underwhelming to me, his films are riddled with pointless, shitty humor (or the films are the pointless, humor themselves), typical of underwhelming "American independent cinema".
24 replies and 17 files omitted. View the full thread
>>1986
I actually like him for that. His movies, albeit political, are subtler than the "left-wing" counterparts for sure.
Replies: >>1990
>>1987
Yes, they aren't horrible and function better than anything Hollywood puts out but it feels like virtue signaling and playing the role of the token conservative.  A good portion of his directorials are self-serving personal projects for the sake of himself wanting to make a film for fun and not for "high art", and not that there's anything loathsome or narcissistic with having the money to make your own movies and star in them because you can, but it doesn't make for a good or relevant film so-to-say.
>DW Griffith
I love Birth Of A Nation and Orphans Of The Storm, but diden't care for anything else. lot of it is just feminist melodrama, a moral tale or some sort of complex for 'Birth' (politically or artistic wise) 
>Charlie Chaplin
I think the idea that comedy needs some sort of pathos is overrated and Chaplin's filmography is an example of that. all pathos is directed towards his 'tramp' character which is himself. he wants the camera to focus on how soft and delicate and morally he is, which he uses this image to compensate his true degenerate self. I also find his slapstick too nuanced to be humorous as compared to contemporary physical comedians like Max Linder and Buster Keaton
>Robert Eggers
I like his first two movies (especially the lighthouse) but I fear he's coming an adult Tim Burton; where his entire oeuvre is a goth gimmick. Northman was boring and felt like a sedated Conan The Barbarian for quirky whyte bois who obsesses over modern depiction of vikings. Nosferatu is interesting for use of superstition vs Science (which is a theme that occurs alot in early gothic literature) but I didn't care for the cuck thing it has going (which isn't too surprising for a Dracula adaptation)
Replies: >>3670 >>3672
>>3665
I could never consider DW Griffith to be anywhere near my least favorite directors but Eggers is fucking terrible and I’d be much harsher on his movies than you are. Nosferatu was pure fucking shit, probably one of the worst movies I’ve seen in the past few months. Seems that most people simply forgot how to correctly use a camera.
>>3665
>DW Griffith
It's hard to take on the guy because he was a pioneer in many senses, it's like criticizing the gait of a baby who learned how to walk yesterday.
For what he tried to do and the systems he made on the run i think he was pretty good.

cg.jpg
[Hide] (415.5KB, 2534x1522) Reverse
Questions/Comments that don't deserve their own thread.

>Previous thread bumplocked >>34
https://archive.is/wip/VtFwQ
https://web.archive.org/web/20231115214701/https://anon.cafe/film/res/34.html

Is Hawkmenblues completely gone? Don't want to scroll through his twitter account. hawkmenblues.net is no more.
Last edited by 11811
68 replies and 31 files omitted. View the full thread
TedKotcheff.jpg
[Hide] (685.8KB, 3500x2280) Reverse
KuFe.jpg
[Hide] (27.1KB, 400x532) Reverse
Goddamn, big hitters are dimming off:

While no one was watching the underrated canadian-bulgarian master Ted Kotcheff signed off in a mexican beach on April 10th at 91yo. A director branded often as a "journeyman" he made several movies outside his realm of Canada/UK, often with an interesting tint of dark comedy.
Some of his movies include the once-lost essential australian film Wake in Fright from 1971, another essential film but for canadians and jews in 1974's The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz, american comedies like 1977's Fun with Dick & Jane, 1978's Who Is Killing the Great Chefs of Europe? and 1989's Weekend at Bernie's, plus 1992's Folks. A classic american sports movie is also under his name, 1979's North Dallas Forty.
Ted was also known for his forays into action stuff with the notable example of 1982's First Blood aka Rambo I i swore the movie was older than that and a late-nite TV surfer classic The Shooter from 1995, on TV he did some stuff which include Bronson's Family of Cops and a couple of old episodes from Law & Order: S.V.U.. 
Most notably, with people knowing but not admitting, some of his most-seen work was several episodes of the anthology series Red Shoe Diaries.
Highly versatile and entertaining, appalled to see the lack of news despite his mainstream work.

Another guy that deserves a mention is Ku Feng, an acting jack of all trades for the Shaw Brothers studio, mainly in the 70's, who got out at 94yo. With more than 300 film credits he was a common sight in HK cinema from that era and was very often the most natural actor in any given scene although that's not saying much considering the usually over-the-top or wooden/deadpan acting in the Chinas, quite versatile too as he could pull off sympathetic side characters or main antagonists all the same in very different settings, sometimes in the same movie and sometimes in the same scene.
Also a known presence in HK television, he was certainly one of the most ubiquitous stock character actors in the entire medium.
Mentioning a movie from his is quite funny because you could download any Shaw movie and there's a very serious 25% chance he's going to be there, 50% if it is action-related, but the ones i recall with gusto are 1966's Come Drink with Me, 1970's Vengeance, 1972's The Boxer from Shangtung, the interesting but flawed The Brave Archer trilogy, 1971's The New One-Armed Swordsman, 1978's 5 Deadly Venoms and The Avenging Eagle, 1979's Life Gamble, 1975's The Flying Guillotine and 1986's Peking Opera Blues. If/when i watch more of those erotic/riceploitation/concubinecore movies i might have another 5 to 10 suggestions, Shaw Bros was basically either kicking chinamen, red-light china intrigues or romcoms in the urban sprawl of Hong Kong.

There's some others that deserve a mention, mostly stunt actors in the martial arts movie category, that i might post later on. Action cinema has been hit hard in the feelings lately.

>>3649
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>3651
>>3650
>I think i deleted the file, might as well re-download it now that you mention his work there was decent.
Ehh, I'm hardly a qualified critic, Anon. I just enjoyed the trashy pop culture character of the movie itself, and Kilmer fit right in!  :D
VLI.mp4
[Hide] (445.3KB, 720x364, 00:04)
>Prophecy of 4chan going down comes about
>Thousands of anons wandering around, including the original thread and its users
>Our /film/ stays the same with none coming in
I think at this point it's safe to say we are probably not going to see a revival of activity, so in this special date rather than calling it or continue feeling dread i hereby vow to never abandon this board and continue posting once a while unless something physically happens to me.
Replies: >>3667 >>3668
>>3666
No one knows we exist, ha ha. But usually when there's an influx of new people they start 10 new threads that go nowhere. Last time 4chan people came over here they didn't really get it either. They thought we were a spinoff of their general /film/ thread.
>>3666
it's better this way. the more people that post here, the lower the quality of the board

2024_.png
[Hide] (2.4MB, 920x2140) Reverse
Hello anons, what were your top flicks of the year 2024?
12 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
LackOfSubstance1.mp4
[Hide] (2.6MB, 1280x536, 00:23)
LackOfSubstance2.mp4
[Hide] (5.5MB, 1280x536, 00:37)
LackOfSubstance3.mp4
[Hide] (7.5MB, 1280x536, 01:01)
JewInTheHat.mp4
[Hide] (4.6MB, 952x536, 00:48)
>>3571
>>3577
I downloaded the thing and shamefur dispray, i can't see the A24 logo and the shot i recall the most wasn't near as interesting as i remembered it, first vid here from 0:19 to end: I recall the zoom out transition from backg to foreg was way faster and covered more distance, i also don't recall the focus pull being that slow, i don't know why i remembered it was already in focus when the zoom finished. I guess all this was because i saw it on the big screen and was quite close it, hence feeling a bit more drastic and my eye movement forgiving some speed details. I apologize.

Also second vid for those who might be remotely interested in this topic: This is what i mean when the movie goes to cartoonish lengths to explain a message or intent, here being the ruthless nature of producers which was shown a minute with 30 seconds before by the same character being overly rude and cold when discussing a business decision, so the director chose to do this to explain further that the guy was quite rude.

Third vid is to support an opinion using fourth vid as genre reference (which is itself another concept failure story): If this shit was worked as a comedy, an absurdist one that doesn't take itself seriously at any point other than plot coherency (and only remotely), it would've worked a bit more interestingly, for example in this third vid w
Message too long. View the full text
>>3576
Architecton dir. Kossakovsky | ? | ?
Sanatorium Under the Sign of the Hourglass dir. Brothers Quay | ? | Afternoons of Solitude dir. Serra
The Wolves Always Come at Night dir. Brady | ? | ?
? | Grand Tour dir. Gomes | Scenarios dir. Godard
Pepe dir. Arias | ? | ?
Abiding Nowhere dir. Ming-liang | ? | ?
? | Journey of Shadows dir. Netzhammer | Tristan und Isolde dir. Grandrieux
Replies: >>3582
>>3575
Secondary is a series of films and multi-media installations. I saw commencement, Astroturf and all in a gallery. Can’t help with a link. Drawing Restraint is an entirely different installation.
>>3579
Architecton dir. Kossakovsky | ? | ?
Sanatorium Under the Sign of the Hourglass dir. Brothers Quay | ? | Afternoons of Solitude dir. Serra
The Wolves Always Come at Night dir. Brady | ? | ?
? | Grand Tour dir. Gomes | Scenarios dir. Godard
Pepe dir. Arias | Lolo & Sosaku: The Western Archive dir. Caballero | ?
Abiding Nowhere dir. Ming-liang | ? | ?
The Garden Cadences dir. Komljen | Journey of Shadows dir. Netzhammer | Tristan und Isolde dir. Grandrieux
Replies: >>3663
>>3582
anyone watch any of these yet? are they worth watching?

babybird.gif
[Hide] (852.3KB, 300x225) Reverse
[JW09 ~ 10/27/2019]
I saw this short by chance last night and really enjoyed it. Well-executed concept with a distinctive visual style. 
>Thursday
>Dir: Matthias Hoegg / UK / 2010

https://invidio.us/watch?v=HQ1z0Zzqg5U

<An everyday love story set in the not so distant future sees blackbirds battling with technology, automatic palm readers and power cuts.

I looked for more content from Matthias Hoegg, but found that he's chosen a more profitable career as animator for hire. Still he's done interesting work for various corporate and non-profit clients.
https://vimeo.com/matthiashoegg
57 replies and 44 files omitted. View the full thread
>>3633
Anime cats are cheating, people will love it no matter what. Just look at Stray, it's a literal walking simulator but people acted like it was some kind of gotyay and it has like 900 trillion sales.
Replies: >>3635
>>3634
Have you actually watched the film, Anon?
>>3633
Flow was fantastic and beautiful, one of the best non anime animated films I've seen in years. And it's always cool to see blender get more use. Also:
>No nig nogs
>No fat ugly women
>No race mixing
>No gays
>No cringe jokes that only exist to virtue single gay opinions and make libtards clap like seals 
>An adorable capybara I'd give my life for
Replies: >>3646
>>3645
>>No nig nogs
>>No fat ugly women
>>No race mixing
>>No gays
>>No cringe jokes that only exist to virtue single gay opinions and make libtards clap like seals
This. I thought teh monke/kot dynamic was pretty good as well. Cheers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQElJP1AaS0&t=97s
>>3633
I’ve grown too cynical over the years to take this kind of news as anything but worthless. Either the academy was interested in changing things up (for renewed interest, credibility, and optics in general, appealing to “alternative” audiences), Blender had some sort of in with this whole ordeal and it somehow amounts to easy promotion, and/or the director is another wet towel who will be directing shit in a few years for big studios (most, if not all,  directors start low budget). The animation itself is ugly in general although the movements are interesting. Regardless, winning an academy award and attending that event sounds like a nightmare and it would be hard to respect the director or anyone involved or to take them seriously as artists. I can’t imagine this movie being good.

sora.jpg
[Hide] (109.4KB, 1200x675) Reverse
kling.jpg
[Hide] (89.4KB, 1280x720) Reverse
What does /film/ think of AI video? Talk the future of it or lack thereof, filmmakers' perspectives, aesthetic criticism, etc.
28 replies and 9 files omitted. View the full thread
>>3631
This is Grok, first attempt
odysseus.mp4
[Hide] (15.7MB, 1706x720, 01:55)
odysseus_bts.mp4
[Hide] (1.7MB, 640x360, 00:49)
Official concept trailer for the anime adaptation of Homer's "The Odyssey"

>I tried AI for character animation, especially dialogue. Generated separately as green screens. The raft is CGI, as well as Poseidon and few other things. Most backgrounds generated with Midjourney, painted out the inconsistencies and layered with 2D/real vfx where needed.
Replies: >>3637
>>3636
This is remarkable for an amateur work, Anon.
What a time to be alive!
AI is fine, only idiots get uppity over it, but it's a new medium and shouldn't be involved in film or painting because it is distinct. You don't submit photos as paintings. 
>>3362
Fat bitch. Makes me almost wanna support ai even more.
Almost.
Replies: >>3644
>>3640
Why shouldn’t it be involved in film? Your argument about painting and photography is barely applicable. Many artists take photos of their subjects and then copy the photos to their painting. AI is simply another tool that can be used or not used depending on how the filmmaker is making their movie. Anyone who believes in continually defining what movies actually are won’t outright dismiss a tool that’s in its infancy. And no, jackasses making AI slop and calling it a movie (like some of what’s been posted in this thread) is not at all what I am justifying or defending.

snapshot0.png
[Hide] (247.6KB, 438x329) Reverse
[JW02 ~ 04/16/2020]
A thread to post and request good documentaries on the variety of subjects.


I'll start with some choice docus on ancient Egypt. All are selected for quality of presentation, study of subject as well as absence of current year agendas, we wuz kangz niggers etc.

Romer's Egypt (3 episodes; 1982) and Ancient Lives (4 episodes; 1984) – the finest and quintessential ancient Egypt presentation; a soothing, in-depth look into ancient Egypt’s life and culture. It has that unmistakable classy 80s look that elevates it above the rest.
https://www.invidio.us/channel/UC4gF7P8JKlJ9xAz8MF6AhFw/videos
https://www.invidio.us/user/xinistri/videos

Egypt: Beyond the Pyramids (4 episodes; 2001) – somewhat similar to Romer’s; not as in-depth or classy but still an enjoyable watch.
https://www.dailymotion.com/search/Egypt%3A%20Beyond%20the%20Pyramids

The Robot, The Dentist and the Pyramid (1 episode; 2020) – an excellent amateur documentary about the latest attempt to explore the shaft of the Great Pyramid.
https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=rhsddHgybTo
Message too long. View the full text
125 replies and 107 files omitted. View the full thread
>>3175
Sounds like it could be worth a watch.
20240128.jpg
[Hide] (3.3KB, 200x113) Reverse
F-16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw4iROXxMMw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhhOin2p5Qs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmM5KSoW2qA
Exactly as I do!
u7vIXKz8cBbb01ISohS9Ty2qN37.jpg
[Hide] (185.2KB, 1000x1500) Reverse
Project Grizzly (Peter Lynch, 1996) - Occupying the space between The Shimmering Beast, Grizzly Man and Robocop this NFB documentary profiles a Canuck backyard inventor developing a protective suit capable of withstanding a grizzly attack. He's motivated by a compelling story of a grizzly encounter in a forest meadow. He was knocked on his back by the animal, stared down, but left alone. He cannot understand why he was spared. He asked for insight from "medicine men and dream analysts"—making you wonder if his mythic story only happened in his imagination.
A news crew caught up with the inventor years after this documentary achieved cult status. He was bitter and disgruntled, forced to sell off his research space and exoskeletons due to the financial hardship of solving problems that no one cared about. And while he dedicated so much of his life to creating a protective shell around his body, testing his prototypes in a decidedly masochistic way, it's crazy that his life ended in a fiery highway collision with a gasoline truck.

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=i6eNK1O-RWw
Replies: >>3639
Zaborger.jpg
[Hide] (173.2KB, 1280x720) Reverse
>>3638
That pic, especially from the thumbnail, looks for the world like if could have been from a Tokusatsu series from the 70's or early 80s..
>Peter Lynch
No relation, I presume?

Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.0